Home/Expert Witness Directory/Fair Market Value

Expert category

Fair market value expert witnesses

Fair market value in condemnation is a defined legal test, not a general sense of worth. Several of its elements rule out things owners assume are included, and the exclusions are where most of the argument sits.

Scope

The questions this expert answers

What would the market have paid

A willing buyer and willing seller, neither compelled, both informed, with reasonable exposure.

At what date

The valuation date fixed by law, not the date of inspection and not today.

Which approach applies

Sales comparison, cost or income, reconciled with a stated reason for the weighting.

Was the project excluded

The project influence rule, which cuts against both sides and is frequently embedded in the comparables.

What about the tax assessment

Assessed value is produced by mass appraisal for taxation and is generally neither admissible nor reliable here.

Is a prior purchase relevant

Relevant evidence, not controlling. Recent and arm\u2019s length carries weight; an unaccepted offer does not.

Selection

What to check before engaging

CriterionWhat to look for
CertificationState certified general appraiser with condemnation assignments
Definition fluencyCan state the jurisdiction\u2019s definition and what each clause excludes
Project influenceDemonstrably screens comparables affected by the project
Date disciplineWorks to the statutory valuation date rather than the inspection date
VerificationConfirms each comparable with a party to the transaction and records it
Market evidenceDerives adjustments from data rather than from experience alone

In practice

Where owners and appraisers diverge

Three disagreements recur. Use: the owner knows the land could be developed, the appraiser values it as it stands. Condition: the owner values improvements at what they cost, the appraiser at what they add, and the second is the right measure. Timing: the owner remembers the market a year ago, the appraisal is as of a fixed date.

None of these is settled by insisting. Each is settled by producing what the definition asks for: comparable sales, zoning history, approvals granted nearby, market data at the valuation date.

The exclusions feel unfair and they are consistent. Compensation is indemnity, so it restores what a sale would have produced. Paying value no buyer would have paid would leave the owner better off than selling, which the standard does not do.

Listed experts

Experts in this category

The directory is being built. Experts practising in this category can write to editorial@eminentdomainexpertwitness.com. Listing is free, requires evidence of credentials and condemnation experience, and is not sold.

In the meantime, how to find an expert sets out the four routes that reach the same population, and the questions worth asking before you engage anyone.

Questions about this category

Is fair market value what my property is worth to me

Almost never, and the difference is excluded by definition. Value peculiar to the owner is not compensated anywhere.

My neighbour sold for more per acre

That may be a comparable sale and it should be in the report. Size, access, zoning, services and date all require adjustment.

Does sentiment or relocation cost count

No. Relocation is handled by a separate statutory programme; sentiment is excluded outright.

Who decides if we disagree

A court or a commission, on competing appraisal evidence, with both appraisers cross examined.

The right expert is the one whose field actually covers the dispute

Start from what is contested, not from a list of names. The category pages explain which discipline answers which question.

Scroll to Top